Given everything you've seen over the past 10 years regarding "science", you really want to trust these guys with chopped up HIV and other virus strains stewed together in a rushed job to vaccinate against a virus that has less chance of killing you than a lightning strike?
(7 votes)
Comments
(Long Spike)
The good thing about this is: idiots will refuse to have a life saving vaccine. Leaving more doses avialable for the sensible people. Darwin rules.
(Old Spike)
(Member)
life saving is a bit of a stretch. the virus has a survival rate of 99% and rising, and that includes the elderly and people with Comorbidities. Also, the vaccine is a is a brand new tech, that was rushed.
You go first, moron. I'll just watch you for 10 years and see what cancers you get.
(Long Spike)
Made up figures do not add to your argument!
Just makes you appear even more of a moron.
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/france/
Current death rate 25% yes twenty five percent.
(Old Spike)
Are you insane Young child? You have got to grow your own brain.
(Long Spike)
You may have grown your own brain? But all you can do is chuck around childish insults.
Another moron.
(Old Spike)
You're misinterpreting AND pulling stats from World of Meters of all places when you could just reference the CDC. Have you been trained by family like Daft to take whatever belief is convenient to you at the moment, slap a "science" sticker on it, and call yourself rational?
(Long Spike)
https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#cases_casesper100klast7days
CDC give a figure of 24.42 !!!!
Not so very different.
TOTAL CASES
20,558,489
TOTAL DEATHS
350,664
(Old Spike)
Sorry you somehow got the math wrong, it is -as expected actually- roughly 1,5% for the figures you stated.
(Long Spike)
1.7 % so I made a typo in my spreadsheet. Whoops sorry.
(Old Spike)
You should correct the child offline, help them think better. But you're not equipped, are you?
(Old Spike)
I'm pro vaccine, pro people not taking the vaccine.
I'm not ok with this sh** being mandatory though, that is not ok.
(Old Spike)
So the vaccination works but patients will appear to be HIV positive.
(Old Spike)
So the proof for the scientific process working as it is supposed to do suddenly becomes an argument against it?
Also: What happened in the last 10 years regarding "science" that we have to be weary of or worried about?
Forget this question if you mean "pseudo science" propagated in certain blogs or politically motivated "cherry picking" or outright false articles and submissions in certain news outlets and blogs. But you don't now, doya.....
(Old Spike)
You are the example. A very lazy person who doesn't think particularly well and relies on others to do his thinking for him. As long as they are on your team and say the word science everything's cool. You are a walking example of the Milgram experiment.
I once saw a pair of fundamentalists watching a fake science program putting forth the argument that humans lived alongside dinosaurs. They never blinked. I don't see much difference between you and them bud.
(Old Spike)
How am I (and probably likeminded) the example? Who are "they" on "my" team?
Give examples of my "lazy" thinking regarding the last 10 years' (or more if you wish) "science" by stating which important facts I simply disregard like your fundamentalists the age of the earth. This could be interesting if you don't cowardly chicken out as usual.
(Old Spike)
As expected, nothing. Coward!