trump lawyer admits election defeat

daftcunt's picture

WATCH: Trump was already removed from office by the voters, lawyer argues

Skip to 1:07 for the good bit.

 

Just when you thought it trumpian comedy is over, here comes the new highlight!

 

I was fucking hosing myself this morning!

 

Now to the trump afficionados: Please tell us what he "really meant" when saying "...he was REMOVED by the voters!"

 

 

3.285715
Average: 3.3 (7 votes)

Comments

Seamonkey89's picture

get over it. its like your entire lives revolve around trump.

 

Trump Derangement Syndrome is real. 

+1
+3
-1
Vote comment up/down
nakedslave's picture

 Time's magazine admitted that the Elitist Cabal won this election.  The Media won this election. Not Bidden.  I don't see how you can be proud and happy to lose your country to that shit. Just because the media told you "Orange man bad" for 8 years.   It;s crazy to think you would rather have the elitist billionair run your country instead of Trump when he was going after these bastards.

Trump was going after China. He was going after the elitist cabal.   He said it on live broadcast tv. He put sanctions in place to fight China trade wars.  Bidden is removing all these Sanctions because he just loves that Red communist cock called China.

 

Again. The only reason you hate Trump is because the media told you to hate him.  You were brainwashed to hating him from day 1.     Operation Mockingbird - Wikipedia  Is winning your minds. You are being brainwashed into liking the Global Elitist cabal.  After Bidden got into office. Ford Company decided to build all their electric vehicle factory in China.   By by american jobs.  Lets give more to china.

+1
+2
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dagambit's picture

They need to impeech him, just incase the voter conspiracy comes into the limelight by something they forgot to clean up. Can't have the real winner taking back over his seat. Must Impeech, even if it means going again the constitution, because before he was even in office this has been the goal. 

 

Riddle me this batman, in the states that paused their voting, how did they know the Congressman and Senators outcome (which were close) vs the presidental outcome they couldn't call, because they hadn't counted all the ballots, the ballots mind you, that also have votes for the congress and senators on them? Isn't that weird? 

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

Look, I can't answer your question, the courts have, various times.

No fucking evidence of considerable voter fraud. Even trumps lawyer says the people have voted him out, no mention of a conspiracy or cabal or cheating or other bullshit.

 

Whether or not some of the circumstances were odd, I can't say, the only thing we can say is it has been investigated, no foul play found.

 

Of course the aficionados think ERVERYTHING is rigged against their idol, but it ain't, because if it were the vote to impeach would have been way more in favour.

+1
-2
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dagambit's picture

You poor soul. It is a lawyer's arguement. He takes the side of what is already known as fact. If the people didn't vote him out, then why did he leave office? He has the right not to concede, think the election is rigged so forth, but he also has the duty to follow the LAW. The law which didn't overturn the election (WHICH NO COURT HAS VIEWED THE EVIDENCE), means he must give up his position. Which he did. 

 

So now, the LAW that says a sitting president can be impeeched to be removed from office - DOES NOT APPLY. 

 

P.S. I will concede if you can show me proof of a court that listened to the evidence that was brought forth and was dismissed on merit. No court wanted that responsibility for fear of retaliation from leftist mobs that would burn their shit to the floor.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

So you are a lawyer now?

 

Get over yourself.

 

Rather than asking me to provide "proof of a court that listened to the evidence" you should provide proof that there actually was proof of wrongdoing presented to a court and ignored.

 

But alt right snowflakes these days want a negative to be proven, like religious nutters.

+1
-3
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dagambit's picture

HAHAHAHA.. omg. Good one. 

 

So you can't give me 1 court that listened to and rejected evidence, WHICH IS THE STATEMENT YOU MADE, burden of proof is on you dipshit. (see i can call names too). 

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture
theblackswordsman's picture

All loopholes.

 

I understand why leftists want all citizens under STRICT laws. They are the type of people that determine RIGHT AND WRONG based on does the law ALLOW us to do it or not.

 

Meaning, if there was no law against murder, they would be the most likely to commit murder. Right and wrong doesn't even register.

 

Disgusting.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

"loopholes"
"right and wrong"

If you don't like the COURT's decision not to admit a case due to lack of evidence the "system is rigged against you"

 

I spat my coffee over my screen laughing (again), little buddy. Gotta clean it up now but it was well worth it!

+1
-1
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman's picture

I don't like a court's decision not to admit a case based on not even LOOKING at evidence or granting forensic audits in time for certifcation.

 

All they did was stonewall and stall out the clock.

 

Big difference.

 

And as far as COURTS go, I have lost most of my respect for them. They don't even seem to care about their own laws. Why should citizens be expected to either at that point? 

 

What makes them any different than bullies? 

 

When you think about it. What actually gives them authority over you? That they have hired thugs that can physically put you in their presence and transfer you into a jail cell for a time period they decide?

 

They can imprison your body sure. But they still have no AUTHORITY over you if you don't give it to them.

 

Look at Charles Bronson for example. Spent almost his whole life in solitary. His mind still wasn't ruled by anyone than himself. And he caused millions of dollars in damages to the places that held him. And an immense amount of pain and suffering to the guards that had to go in there and subdue him among other prisoners that tried to push their way onto him. THAT is authority.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

I am not at all surprised that this kind of person is an idol of yours.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman's picture

I'm sure you imagine me as some kind of dumb savage. No.

 

I think before I act. But I do have standards of living and liberty, and I will not give them up. Unlike many, I have a line in the sand, and I will fight to protect it. 

 

I also won't fall for the SCAM that life is more valueable than liberty. To believe that life is more precious than freedom only marginalizes every person that has died fighting against tyranny.

 

If you never had to fight for yourself against those that seek to own you, then you could never understand.

 

Growing up, I was beset on all sides by bullies. And there was no daddy to come fix  it for me. I learned early that sometimes you have to fix your own problems. Most of the time you can talk and sort them out. Sometimes, some people don't care for reasoning, they want something from you, and they'll use force to take it. You can either live in misery and fear as their slave, or you can fight them.

 

What do you think rights are? Are they what your given government says they are? Are they what your society says is acceptable? Or are they something you are born with, and your personal responsibility to maintain?

+1
-1
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

"I think before I act" More often than not doesn't include the activity *typing shit on spiked*, little buddy.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman's picture

I knew you would say that.

 

Why can't you be yourself on here? What are you trying to prove with your selective listening?

+1
-1
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dagambit's picture

I appreciate you finding an article. The problem is these were all open statements and never got to the witness part. The only one that is super suspect was the AZ one. Where they acknowledged clerical errors and dismiss the case without a forensic audit. Now that is still being disputed in AZ and there will be hell to pay for the people that just brushed it off. Understand we are talking about 10k votes per state at most for the divide and 30-50k votes are the swing for illegal votes per state in question. 

 

Ask youself, had this been the other way around... how much news coverage do you think this would have gotten. I don't know if Biden won or not, or if Trump won or not, I do know there is a lot of easy to see quesitons that aren't being looked at or answered. 

 

Spikes of votes early in the morning. Why weren't there any spikes during the day or evening? 

Votes actually subtracted from Trump

Testimony of people scanning illegal ballots, new printed ballots, scanning them more than once as a batch

Kicking observers out of the the ballot process

decemials in the votes  there is no .004 of a person

dead people voting

people out of state or not in the county voting

people stealing and voting for others by mail

 

Too many questions and the news is mostly silent. The Senate hearing that should have went viral, said this was the most secure election in history (propaganda), and yet our votes were being tallied in other countries as the machines were proven BY THEIR OWN INSTRUCTION MANUALS to be hooked up to the internet. 

 

 

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

"....never got to the witness part"

 

There are very good reasons for that. Plenty of accusations don't go to court because there is simply not enough evidence to even start a court case. If that weren't the case courts would be blocked in no time.

 

The "common sense proof" is that not all judges that threw this out were leftist marxist, it is simply unlikely.

+1
-1
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

And here goes, USSC dismissed all lawsuits:
 

+1
-2
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dagambit's picture

Yup, time expiration. Quite simply put, since you didn't address anything I wrote above as an example directly, I will address one of yours. 

 

"... because there is simply not enough evidence... " 

 

Over 1000 Affit Davits signed under penality of perjery. Affit Davits are evidence and have been used in various other court cases to put people behind bars.  Not looked at by the courts. When we talk about why no one wanted to take the case, you have to look at everything from a wide angle. Like it or not, you have a boiling point that has already spilled over a few times by the left the entire year. Riots all over, people carving out subcities inside of existing ones and cops and Trumpers targeted. As soon as there is any push back, the left cries victims and says shit like, they are insurred or whatever.  I have made this point before in greater detail how the media, and politicians back this movement, until it turns on them, then it is their 911 or cops need to be called to protect their home. 

 

If looked at and overturned, I believe mass destruction and then possibly with mainstream media gaslighting most thought we were headed to another civil war. This countries vote was stolen, then held hostage by the left. That is how I feel and there are MILLIONS just like me. 

 

If it wasn't, why not hear the court cases and broadcast the hearing live on TV? Shoot it down and destroy the rhetoric once and for all? Make Trump out to be the winey baby they paint him as? Ruin his name forever!  They did it for Bush vs Gore, so what is the excuse this time?  That is the real question. 

 

Instead we will just have to move on as they paint over the incident with words and change the reality. 

1 side favors truth above all, the other side favors power above all .. and POWER is what wins. What good is truth if you can't enforce it? 

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman's picture

In good news. Over a dozen states including Nevada and Tennesse have banished concealed carry permits, everyone can carry as intended. More states expected to follow. They are pre empting the grabs, so if the bill passes, there will be non compliance on the state level.

 

They want a war, they'll get one. Once the first wave is repelled and communites are secured and united, they'll see what a real revolution looks like. Names are being taken. People will be held responsible.

 

Corperations, denial, and stepping out of office won't save them.

 

God have mercy.

 

They can still stop this nonesense by returning everything to normal. But time is running out, and their actions are saying the opposite.

 

When this is over, we arn't paying the world bank a dime. We are walling up, isolating, deporting illegals, and only exporting at the price we decide. The rest of the world can deal with it's own problems.

+1
-1
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

"Yup, time expiration."

So following months of research they couldn't produce sufficient evidence to even tempt scotus (which is predominantly conservative now).

 

Again, you imply that magically all courts are leftist biased or "bought" or "hijacked". You can sweet talk this as much as you like, this simply is unlikely. 

 

 

 

"Over 1000 Affit Davits signed under penality of perjery. " 

 

Doesn't mean that these statements are relevant, the most prominent ones that even included video evidence that were also shared on here have all been debunked.

 

 

+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down