Time admits and Celebrates the BIG RIG

Comments

theblackswordsman's picture

The TIME piece was a pre prepped article meant to counter the evidence gathered by the experts in absolute Truth.

 

This shows how terrified the REAL cabal is. If it was all nonesense everyone would sit back and laugh.

 

We arn't their information target, they are seeing people wake up in the thousands every day and they are targeting those still asleep. If we unite, they lose a lot of their progress.

 

We are winning. 

+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000's picture
Master Mind

you should play the jacobin video. they spend a good half hour or more talking about something they didn't realize is satire.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman's picture

You're scared Sal.

 

You rush in to supress everything that threatens your fascist communism.

 

Stay vigilent.

+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
skeptoid's picture

I *think* he's trying to claim 7:05 was just satire. Which is incredible - how far can you bend before you break? 

+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000's picture
Master Mind

i don't know the time stamps. i just know i laughed yesterday at when he read a part and then called it a lie, then he read another part. something like "stop trump conspiracies" and said something like "see, they didnt want trump to win"

 

but seriously. you going to post the jacobin video or do i have to post a video of someone talking about tim talking about it?

 

also. when you said 2 episodes of wandavision were going to be showing and i showed you how only one was going to. was that censorship? i know its fact checking but people on the right seem to think its censorship. like candace owens

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman's picture

You're just upset that people with influence and money are taking action.

 

All of the fact checkers you respect are false. Many of them connected to CCP.

+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
skeptoid's picture

You still DON'T understand, do you? Tim is posted here not for people to form their opinion on the article through agreement with Tim. He's posted because he covers the beat - many beats - he reads the article, and he gives his opinion about the article. We then respond to the article and Tim's opinion (or, at least we used to before it became about suppression here). 

 

Do you have a video of a person reading the article and giving their opinion about it for us on the site here, sal? Not a video of someone watching Tim read an article and talk about the article and then talk about how Tim is talking about the article. Do you get it?

 

And about Wandavision - your thinking is so completely bizarre. Did you read my response to you showing me I misinterpreted the trailer (Actually I didn't realize it was old - thought it was new)? I left the post up there for a while before deleting so you would read it. I'll post it here - Thanks, Sal, for clearing that up so that I didn't go into Friday morning expecting two and only getting one and didn't get anyone else's hopes up either. 

 

Sal censorship isn't even weilding 4 sock accounts and a cadre of children to exploit the rating system on this site to "make discussions go away". There's a term for it - you ready? Wait for it...wait for it....yes that's right it's called RIgging. If it bothers you so much that Tim reads the article then just find someone else to read the article to us. Good luck.

+1
+3
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000's picture
Master Mind

i totally get it. everything, regardless of who it is or what its about is open to criticism. i'm sure that since tim makes so many videos he's probably critized other people in the business the same way. what they say. how they say it... it's all fair game. you take the good, you take the bad, you take them both and there you have the facts of life, the facts of life

 

i don't usually post a video of someone reading an article that you could read youself. i would have just posted a link with a somewhat relevant video. i read the article twice and i still feel ike its a joke. its satire or its making fun of people. i expected more from a secret cabal, not a bipartisen group of people that started a business, got a liscense, rented office space and got to talking to business' to crack down on misinformation and securing access for people to vote.

 

don't think too much about the wanda censorship thing. its just a joke i didn't get a chance to put up. i'm not sure about pietro. it could be a crowd pleasing cameo. or it could be that wanda's bubble is also present on a different universe and it's quicksilver entered it. it could also be that wanda vision isn't the same universe as the past movies.

 

i don't have another account and it's the same system that applied to all. i'm not sure if you can call it rigging. it was always the same, people changed how they used it.

 

but now i'm wondering, what did you think of scott adams using socket accounts?

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman's picture

My room mate and I talked about that this morning. About the Cabal making such a foolish mistake.

 

But it is 4d chess.

 

This piece dropped same day as the public demonstration of electoral fraud in Lindells video. It's also in response to many of us pointing out to others the tactics they use in their propoganda campaign against the unwelcome anomaly in "their" white house. Trump of course.

 

Their misdeeds have been bursting at the seems and it has taken us awhile to pinpoint what they are doing, let alone explain that to people. Nevertheless, we are succeeding in calling it out.

 

So if they deny the claims, that increases our agression against them, and peaks more curiosity from those that don't yet see their subversion.

 

But if they admit to "some" of it and reshape it, it serves to quiet curious minds, injecting more sedative by ackowledging our arguements with a pat on the head, and then reframing the narrative to make them look like heroes, and attempt to further make the steal seem legitimate. It's masterfully done gaslighting trying to tell others that we "The patriots" are right to be upset, but claiming we are upset about the wrong things.

 

What the TIME piece really translates to is "Your honor, I didn't strangle her, I was preserving the oxygen in her chest cavity."

 

The number one goal of the REAL cabal is to stop us from uniting at all costs, and to stop us from "creating" more patriots. It's plain as day now. They want to use good well meaning citizens to destroy us in civil war. Not waste their military resources on subjugating the population.

 

Same crap that happened in the chinese Civil war, same crap as the American civil war. (Which was more complicated than most realize. It wasn't just about slaves.) Same crap as the Kashmere civil war where Bangledesh and Pakistan first split. And many other civil wars. It's their go to tool kit when they can't occupy with force and take on a United Nation.

 

Some food for thought. Why hasn't Biden done ANYTHING to unite the American people under amenable terms like he promised? That should be priority one. If he was worth anything.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000's picture
Master Mind

you know the author of the article also wrote a book about pelosi? by her tweets, she's definitely not for trump. pretty sure she's a democrat. the more i think about the article, the more it feels like premium gaslighting.

 

i don't know the specifics but i saw something last week or this week about biden not wanting to negotiate about the covid stimulus or something because of something in 2007 when they tried to do that and the gop ended up blocking anyways. if you got the power why ask? republicans don't, only took then 8 days to put in a new supreme court judge while telling obama he couldn't appoint anyone with a year left.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman's picture

Pelosi is considered by many as the most dangerous Speaker of the House in American history. She's not jus a democrat, she's a tool for the new world order.

 

Many democrates promised to vote against the renewal of her speakership this year, and then she threatened them one a time to change their vote. Alot of democrat voters are not happy about that.

 

Most republican voters are not Republican party loyalists either. We are aware of the amount of filth taking up seats in that party.

 

I think the Patriot party is a good idea. Only as long as it stands for Patriot values, and stands for strengthening and protecting the constitution. Unlike most of these Republican and Democrat oathbreakers.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
skeptoid's picture

First, let me be clear that I've never once thought you were using sock accounts or rigging. It's why I engage with you with a level of respect I do not grant certain others and you know who I'm talking about. 

 

I think anyone using sock accounts is pathetic. Post election started watching Adams because I wanted someone who was paying attention to the evidence that is hyper-rational as a proxy so I wouldn't have to waste time sifting through it myself. He was the one who was shooting down the GOP conspiracy theories on a regular basis while pointing that the conditions were ideal for massive fraud to have occured. He has huge blind spots that I believe are the result of his materialist worldview. He knew he was being shadowbanned and I could see him rationalizing the use of sock accounts to counter sock accounts. I was tempted to do that here but I have a crazy notion that Jesus sees everything I do and although I may have gotten away with it and defeated the rigging with my own rigging, well good 'ol Jesus would known and I'd have to carry that shame like I carry other shameful things I've done in my life. The lighter the better I say, even if the road is harder. Scott doesn't have a thing like that - I stopped watching his daily vids in mid January. What was the accusation and do you know how he responded?

 

Oh lol shit I just checked in on him and he's doing a "how to draw Dilbert" tutorial live right now:

 

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Seamonkey89's picture

They're trying to get ahead of a narrative. Frame the cheaters as gardians. 

+1
+3
-1
Vote comment up/down
skeptoid's picture

It very much looks like that, yes. Because this would have come out.

+1
+2
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

Didn't you want to spare us from your hate for "at least half a year" until it is "safe to post again" because otherwise "they" will come and get you?

 

Read the fucking article pooltard! But hey it is way better to have your opinion presented to you on a tasty little platter prepared by little grey riding hood.......

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman's picture

We all have. They are admitting to propoganda and conspiracy to change the outcome of the will of the people.

 

And that wasn't even that successful. They had to launch the largest combined cyber assault on the election in world history to make the steal happen.

 

Their grip is weakening daily.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
skeptoid's picture

It's really interesting how the rating profiles have changed on video posts now that a certain incentive has been taken away don't you think?

 

Just because you can't erase the post from the site doesn't mean that you shouldn't keep piling on the false ratings because it makes it really clear to us all what you were up to. And now you're super angry that your little toy has been taken away from you.

 

Where's Donald duck I want to see Donald.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman's picture

I suppose that's a bonus. I just wanted the preservation of information and conversation. As opposed to in the past as soon as conversations started going anywhere, they were wiped from existance, only for everyone to argue about the exact same things again and again.

+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

 

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
skeptoid's picture

The request was for Donald. Been a long time since we've had a Spiked post with a 33 comment thread and rising, and that was largely thanks to you. I don't think you're laughing right now.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

Spare us from your hatred you little pompous cunt. Of course I laugh about you and the funny little peers you have on here especially when you think you are so important with your mission on here. You're not. I'm not. At least I (and a few others) know it and I can happily live with it because I actually do have a life in the outside world.

 

Go and get help, you desperately need it.
 

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
JTrillo's picture
Beta Tester

Seems like Trump got played at his own game. And lost. That's all I'm seeing here. Funny how now no one is talking about voter fraud anymore, but now it's all about rules being changed. Yeah sure, rules were changed to make it easier to mail in your vote. This just meant that more people were voting. That's a good thing. To me this is probably the fairest election we've had, as opposed too all the other elections where it was more difficult for the poorer or less motivated to vote, as they had to show up in person.

Republicans are just pissed now that mail in voting has become something we're going to expect every 4 years now and they have to change their battleplans if they want to win. Sucks to be them lets see if they figure it out in the next 4 years or not.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman's picture

We are still talking about voter fraud.

 

The TIME piece was counter intel to distract people from the EVIDENCE of the fraud that was released on the same day.

 

We can actually keep track of more than one crises at a time without taking our eye off the ball.

 

People that voted for Trump voted for his POLICIES. Which is what people are supposed to vote for in a candidate. Nobody made Biden promise anything. All they cared about is that he wasn't Trump. 

 

Many Biden voters have buyers remorse growing by the day.

+1
-1
-1
Vote comment up/down
JTrillo's picture
Beta Tester

I've been asking for evidence for widespread voter fraud from every Trump supporter who claims it. Most don't show me anything, the rest send me things that are simply odd or unexplained.

It doesn't matter if people voted or Biden because he isn't Trump, that's how the two party system works. If you don't like either you generally vote for the one you dislike the least. Trump was incredibly unpopular, so it was time for a change. ANY democrat would have won against Trump.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman's picture

Watch absolute proof. Watch it all the way through if you have 2 hours of patience. If not, skip to about 137:00 Where forensic specialists had trackers set up to track the votes from the machines.

 

Why watch the whole thing? Because Mike interviews all kinds of experts that explain their credentials, how they specialized in the investigation, they explain the EXACT methods they used in sorting through this. One even going to so far as to use Cobalt programming language to to reverse track the changes made to cover their tracks. They show you the untampered logs with all of the information.

 

It outlines that votes from the machines were sent to servers OVERSEAS and flipped then sent back. It has the real logs of the votes. It has I.P. adresses, device I.D.s, companies that handled them, time stamps, amount of votes, who they switched to. Every one of the contested states in question was really a Trump state.

 

Trump was not unpopular. His haters are the ones that control most communication platforms and scream the loudest. His unpopularity was a manufactured illusion.

 

The TIME piece practically admitted this. They only told you the tip of the iceberge as to how deep the propoganda campaign runs. A crumb of truth  to put people back to sleep. Definitely not the whole cake.

 

Don't watch the OPINIONS on Absolute Proof. Watch the source yourself. Make up your own mind.

+1
-1
-1
Vote comment up/down
JTrillo's picture
Beta Tester

137:00 on what?

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman's picture

www.michaeljlindell.com

 

If that part peaks your curiosity, or you want more understanding. Go back to the beginning and watch the whole thing.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
JTrillo's picture
Beta Tester

Where did those charts come from?

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman's picture

Cyber warfare specialists and former members of the intelligence community. The video interviews a bunch of them that were directly involved in this investigation.

 

These trackers were set up before the election, to track it. And samples of data were pulled out of the machines for a forensic investigation.

 

The video interviews them and explains the exact methods on how they got this data.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
JTrillo's picture
Beta Tester

Sure, so how do we validate their authenticity?

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman's picture

I would say keep your eyes peeled if the military or the Supreme court / federal courts review this and re open the investigation in the coming weeks.

 

Watch all the news sources, because as long as CNN is around they would never cover this.

 

Check CNN, Fox, OAN, Newsmax, and a variety of others.

 

Every time anything drops I watch all of them.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
JTrillo's picture
Beta Tester

Sure, but this isn't evidence then is it? It's a claim.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman's picture

If it came directly from the machines themselves during the election itself then it is evidence. Actually. It's conclusive PROOF.

 

Like I said. Watch the whole thing.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
JTrillo's picture
Beta Tester

IIIIIIIIIIFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF.

If it did then we go from there.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman's picture

That I can agree on as a reasonable doubt.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
theblackswordsman's picture
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down