The meat is in the first 15 mins so no need to watch the whole thing.
Basically a study of vaccine injured patients was done, and presented as all being cured, however most particpants in the study are not cured at all.
This is beyond disturbing...
(1 vote)
Comments
(Old Spike)
Link to the study?
(Old Spike)
You dumb bro?
Covid Vaccine had zero research done
WeYou are the lab rat. Aint hard to believe that the vaccine has bad reaction. This shit will start popping more and more.I got a bunch of idiot over here that says "Poolio vaccine isnt harmfull, Everyone has poolio vaccine. Why not get the covid vaccine?"
Poolio vaccine killed thousands and thousands of children during its first 30 years of release. it took 30 years before the research on the poolio vaccine to improve. I think the count was around 80 000 dead children from Polio vaccine. ( I may be off a little on that number)
It takes 8 years for a vaccine to get the study and research before being release to public. The goverment rushed that covid vaccine in 6-8 months.
(Old Spike)
You call people dumb because they ask for information? Are YOU dumb, bro?
Also I found no such data on the polio vaccine from reputable sources doing a superficial search, maybe you can shed a light on that, bro?
(Old Spike)
Even if he gave you the info. You still wouldnt believe in the facts, unless it came from your Boyfriend Dr Fauci and the lying CDC
(Old Spike)
So you have no data to back up your claims, as always, but still can't shut up you dumb fuck.
(Old Spike)
they're reading directly from the paper, and regardless this woman has more information than is in the paper since she was one of the participants and has contact with most of the other participants also. if you really still need the paper it's in the youtube video description.
(Old Spike)
2nd Paragraph printed BOLD:
This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.
By the looks of it we're shooting first and then ask questions?
I find it very concerning that participants know each other and are able to discuss the study because that is very likely to lead to distorted results.
So we'll have to be patient and wait for the peer reviews...... But the conspiracy nutter's strong suit isn't patience now, is it.
(Old Spike)
So, as coincidence (or fate?) decided the daughter of one of my clients is a biochemist at a british university who is taking part in clinical studies. So I took the opportunity to ask her whether or not patients taking part in such studies usually meet. As suspected the answer is a strict NO! Even the people taking the samples are different from those that test them. At least if the study is carried out professionally.
So I rest my case, the young lady is talking bull! But of course this is sucked up by those vulnerable to such bull rather nicely.