More Voting fraud by Former Staff of Clinton Administration

Comments

sato's picture

idk i'm interested but i can barely stand 10 mins of this guy. can you give us a tl;dw versio or at least a timestamp to the relevant parts?

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dagambit's picture

He is very annoying to watch, more annoying to listen too. His voice gets really squeaky. 

 

TL:DR version - They are issuing corrections on mistakes made either by saying a different address then the one listed. Example is like 845 vs 745  or wrong photo taken (which is still funny because empty lots) 

 

They have tracked down 30 addresses, supposedly were people live, but there are no homes or buildings proving voter fraud by old role calls that were never updated. Someone needed votes and had to find people to enter. They are still going to addresses in Nevada but they are at 30 right now. The question he poses is, how many do we need to find before it is investigated by a proper team, that has the resources. 

 

Also, important note. As a citizen this is the least invasive way to check for fraud. As access to who voted for whom or if the mail in ballot doesn't have creases (i.e. Xeroxed). 

 

Interestingly, with limited resources only using public information they have found 30 right off the back. They just sent 2 people in a car and found fraud with incredible ease, that is scary. 

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
trooper_trent's picture

 

Watch from the 6:20 mark.  Just for a few minutes.

 

https://youtu.be/hmZ06IFShmM?t=379

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
skeptoid's picture

My rule with Crowder is that, at least where his show is concerned, I watch until I am offended and then I leave. But I'm usually offended by an attempt at humor that wasn't funny - this I find MOST offensive. He's good for clips though, and if his little segment on voter fraud was replete with errors I guess Bill Richmond is in trouble. We'll have to wait and see.

+1
-1
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

dumber with crowder, lol.

 

he is the bridge between beeny pool and alex jones, hillarious comedy!

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dagambit's picture

Not an arguement, not convincing anyone to your side. This is why we have a divide. Help us see your side, dispute this, if you can't then stop living in denial and join the cause. 

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

I voiced my concern regarding him many a time, it is literally the same as with pool, the alt right's favourite "news reader". 

 

ANYTHING they say must be fact checked as they tend to bend the truth their way, both are notorious for it, crowder is worse than pool.

+1
+2
-1
Vote comment up/down
skeptoid's picture

"Steven Crowder is literally the same as Tim Pool." - Daft Cunt, 2021

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

Now we know why you need someone to read the news to you......

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
trooper_trent's picture

I disputed it plainly with actual facts, cited sources of voter registration, a video showing they were being willfully deceiving (taking a video of the empty lot across the street with the actual apartment complex directly behind them.  It's all public record and so easy to spot if you aren't trying to stay in a bubble of misinformation.  These are a small handful of clerical errors or being willfully ignorant. not millions of cases of blatant votor fraud. I'm so fucking sick of this.
The courts all ruled against it. No evidence, his legal team kept quitting on him.  Fucking shut up with this voter fraud shit. Go read the actual transcripts. I did! There was NOTHING presented. NOTHING, not even to the Supreme court. god damn it this is so frustrating.

+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dagambit's picture

I will disagree. You showed a guy who saw an INVALID address, did some digging and found where there address could be. That doesn't excuse the invalid address on the voter role, which makes the vote INVALID. Common sense and reviewing what someone else says the person "could be" and likely lives, doesn't give anyone the right "in post" to correct a ballots information. An official can neither fill out a ballot for someone or correct anything on it, past the Identification stage of the voter voting.  

 

PERIOD. There is no gray line. 

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
skeptoid's picture

You're desperately looking for any error that you can find and using that to invalidate the entire fraud hypothesis while ignoring the 95% of other examples that resolve true. Bubble. Then you claim that you're a rational person who just looks at things objectively and wants to know the truth. But you really don't, do you?

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
3pointdog's picture

The voter fraud is real. I had received 2 diff people's names' votes mail in ballots in the mail at my house during the election and i was registered under democrat. It didn't really make sense at the time but afterwards I knew what was going on.

+1
+2
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dagambit's picture
daftcunt's picture

"Ramirez, a Republican, is facing one count of organized election fraud,::::"

 

 

And I keep on hosing myself!

 

+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dagambit's picture

Not sure why I was voted down on my previous comment, no one agrued it wasn't legit. Just haters I guess. 

 

Voter Fraud is Real

 

They don't have the data for 2020 yet. but feel free to click a state. If you try Texas, you will even see election overturned.  My point is it matters and I am glad we are catching some. Before you go all strawman on me, let me re-itterate my position; Let the "evidence" be heard, then debunk it or send people to prison or at the very minimum fix the problem.

 

This link does not take into account of votes found in dumpsters or side of the road that always seem to be heavily leaned accounted for one candidate. Electronic failures, clerical mistakes, these are people who are PROVEN to try to cheat and add more votes to the system and have been caught and punished. 

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
trooper_trent's picture

Did you attempt to vote multiple times under those names? were you able to do it without any form of ID? were you successful?  So what FRAUD was committed? I get mail sent to me for the wrong person all the fucking time.  Credit card shit, tax shit, extended warranty shit, is that fraud?

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
skeptoid's picture

Anyone could have shown up at certain voting places without the package at all and given his address as their own and voted and in addition to his vote those other two votes would have counted. Do you understand that?

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Seamonkey89's picture

Everyone knows they cheated. There needs to be repercussions. 

+1
-2
-1
Vote comment up/down
trooper_trent's picture

the common "everyone knows" fallacy. that, and the "you're lying to yourself if you don't admit".

Everyone knows you're a pervert and sniff kids' underwear.  If you can't admit there's something wrong with doing that, then you're lying to yourself.

+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dannzilla's picture

I really miss 2013 Spiked Nation :(

+1
+2
-1
Vote comment up/down
skeptoid's picture

Ah that's when my avatar was a picture of Ron Paul. With Trump sidelined things should slowly but progressively move in that direction.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down