Mass Stabbing kills 4 Injures 2 in California

Comments

sato's picture

with guns 22 dead 26 injured, without guns 4 dead 2 injured.

 

yes without guns people will still find ways to kill others - much less deadly ways.

+1
-2
-1
Vote comment up/down
Pantysoaker's picture

i prefer explosions

+1
+3
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

Trying to talk sense to the deluded again? 

+1
+2
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dagambit's picture

you should change your username to TrollingCunt

 

It fits you so much better.

+1
+5
-1
Vote comment up/down
Maxpower's picture

Except for that Truck of Peace that killed 86 people in Nice, France. More dead than in any mass shooting in US history.

+1
+3
-1
Vote comment up/down
Fullauto223cal's picture

If someone nearby had had a gun perhaps there could have been only 1 person dead, the motherfucker who decided to knife people.  But sure, they were stabbed to death, I guess their murders don't really matter.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Fullauto223cal's picture

86 people with a big ass truck.  Tell me more about "much less deadly".

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sato's picture

once. a single incident doesn't prove a general rule. 334 were killed by armed terrorists in russia in 2006.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Fullauto223cal's picture

"33 dead after man sets fire at anime studio Kyoto Animation, Japan authorities say"

 

Tell me more about other shit being less deadly?

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sato's picture

again, once, and it wasn't because fire is more deadly than guns, it was because the building was a massive fire hazard. it would've been 5 only the fire escape doors were locked.

 

you sure u want to know more? because none of any of the rest of it agrees with what you want to be true.

+1
+2
-1
Vote comment up/down
ubershin's picture

I THOUGHT ASSAULT KNIVES WERE BANNED IN CALIFORNIA!!! LAND OF FRUITS!!!! LETS BAN ANYTHING THAT KILLS INCLUDING CARS AND JETS!!!!! NOT GUNS!!!!

+1
-2
-1
Vote comment up/down
monkeymania's picture

More and higher rpm guns will balance everything out.

 

giphy

+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
stokkebye's picture

Imagine if just one of those victims had a handgun, it would be only one dead.

+1
+2
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

Yeah, dream on. 

+1
-1
-1
Vote comment up/down
backdraft's picture
Beta Tester

The problem with any mass killing is always "People didn't have enough guns"

+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
sato's picture

no that's a logical fallacy. if someone else could get weapons more easily, then the perp also would be able to get better weapons more easily, and we'd be at the 22 dead with 28 wounded stat like the other day.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

I admire your stamina, it's a bit like explaining the significance of carbon dating to a creationist, right?

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

Meanwhile in El Paso.....

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down