I don't know this content creator but he gives a thoroughly enjoyable review of the movie and the situation at Disney at large. Here's hoping that South Park's Panderverse is indeed the flashpoint that starts to turn things back around (in Hollywood at least). Enjoy.
No votes yet
Comments
(Long Spike)
Disney went up 8% in the stock market today, they are good my dude
(Site Administrator)
I dunno. I'm encouraged by the thought that the stink raised by South Park follows them around and they feel boxed in, knowing that the rest of the world knows..if you get me.
(Long Spike)
check out his content
you can tell the exact moment this guy figured out the grift
(Site Administrator)
Was it Rachel Zeglar's Snow White? I heard it was bad. I didn't know it damaged people's brains. Still enjoyed his video above though. Or do I need to hate it cause I need to hate him? (Not sure what's being suggested here).
(Long Spike)
its when he made his first THEY HATE THEM video a year ago and instead of thousands of views, he got a few million. from that point, he transitioned from lore stuff to THEY HATE THEM kinds of videos.
i'm re-suggesting something from just over a year ago
(Site Administrator)
Looking at your screenshot comment below that's a little unfair to the guy. He's a published author, well-spoken and have you ever searched YouTube for 'Drinker recommends'? He likes plenty of stuff! I guess what I'm suggesting is barring content creators that spew racism or hate speech (or chronic misinformation), we shouldn't be quick to paint with a broad brush either. Listen to the experts. In the case of the Marvels, above, studio interference seems to have killed this baby in utero. Even professional critics agree.
Cheers man.
(Long Spike)
look at his content. consider how this guy hasn't liked anything in over a year. out of critical drinkers 413 videos, he recommends 26 of them, of those. 8 of them are from the pre 2000's. his recommends are a 15th of his content. they're not in the business to recommend
like, i've been thinking that you're putting it out there that you're listening to these guys for their reviews when i know you're listening to them for their anti-woke diatribe and a confrontation on it is going to have you claim that it's just happenstance
broad brush in the right hands is a dangerous weapon
(Site Administrator)
Thanks for the info. Next time include a pivot table if you have time. Like I said previously, you do you, I guess.
The risk of going hard in the paint as you say..open a window, so the fumes don't get to you.
(Long Spike)
Ok, so when you wrote 'you do you", above, you were really hoping that would be the end of the matter?.... on this site?!
Hi Bobbob and welcome to Spiked. My name's sal9000 and along with being an experienced piece of shit, i've got a lot of free time
would be pretty cool to have a pivot table with key words, find out they've used the word woke by a number divisible by 3
but you're getting pie charts for now
critical and his 413 videos
he likes plenty of stuff...
this other guy, may 18th of last year was a game changer. he's got 311 vids. 172 before, and 139 after
and that 15.1% is from may to september, he stopped making that stuff from then to now
look at the experts like ebert, reviewed 10k movies, rated 60 of them 0. on the surface it might seem like you're listen to them for their expertise but its really more about getting reassurances for your ideological views
we're more than likely to have some conversations, i've been putting some of them off. i'm going to try and change some of your opinion and i'm more than likely going to piss you off along the way cause you're going to feel as though i'm attacking you for having them. so remember, my words only have as much meaning as you give them
(Site Administrator)
Attack the position and not the person is usually a good rule of thumb (I'm trying to be better at this myself). So have at it if you must. Maybe start by stating which one of my (perceived) opinions you wish to change first. And as long as our rules of engagement mean we're both open to changing our opinions, even if just in part. If you can't agree to this latter part, ie. debate as opposed to you strawmanning and attacking, you'll be playing alone.