ELECTION WORKERS FILLING IN BALLOTS Delaware County, Pennsylvania

Comments

Maxpower's picture


This guy actually looks around to make sure no one is watching him first. lol

+1
-2
-1
Vote comment up/down
trooper_trent's picture

Again, pathetically grasping at straws.

the ballot is run through. If it does not scan, they put it in a pile that gets sorted to find out WHY it doesn't get counted.
The vast majority is because the person filled in the bubble too lightly.  So in an effort to make their vote count rather than just rejecting it, the workers darken the circles under heavy scrutiny for fairness.

This is not a new process. This happens in all elections, every time. Why all of a sudden is this standard process a scandal?

+1
+4
-1
Vote comment up/down
Maxpower's picture

Why do we keep seeing Republican poll watchers kicked out or forced to stand at such ludicrous distances away that they've had to resort to using binoculars? Why are we seeing them prevent people from looking in on them by taping poster board to the windows?

 

If all these workers are doing nothing wrong, and they're just following standard procedure, then there should be no attempts to hide their activities. They should be making every effort to be as transparent as possible.

 

 




+1
-2
-1
Vote comment up/down
trooper_trent's picture

probably to keep them from... oh I don't know... INTERFERING?  I have no idea and have no context other than hearing it from the poll workers themselves where they talk about priding themselves in being impartial and methodical despite all the yelling and protesting to "COUNT THE VOTE" or "STOP THE COUNT" all coming from the right, depending on whether Trump was behind or ahead.

But just like the other videos this is a 3 second clip of people cheering. is this supposed to be evidence the whole thing is rigged? My guess is they were cheering for kicking out an asshole that was being beligerent or refusing to wear a fucking mask.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dagambit's picture

Yes, when I sort things I do it with a pen too. I need all the writing utensils. He is grading the ballots obv.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
nakedslave's picture

Hey Trooper_Trent...

When you are in the middle of typing something on Spikednation. Do you look around you twice SUSPICIOUSLY before you hit Submit?

 

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
trooper_trent's picture

No, but I also don't make assumptions based on a single video with no context. He could have been looking around for someone talking, or calling his name. He could have been responding to any number of things. He could be reacting to a bunch of trumptards screaming at him for all I know. I wasn't there so I can't presume to know the reason.  There are countless videos going around where people are SAYING voter fraud but without knowing or being able to demonstrate what is actually happening in the video.

This, like EVERY OTHER "fraud" video lacks ANY context.  The guy wheeling video equipment into a random building at night, people covering up the windows, bla bla bla bla. Include this with any kind of context to indicate WHY it was happening and then we can talk.

 

Now if you want to talk about actual facts, like GOP setting up fake ballot drop off boxes, the removal of all but one drop off box per county, gerrymandering, the president preemptively delegitimizing mail in ballots trying to instill doubt in the system,etc. then we can, but this conspiracy shit is childish and ridiculous.

 

I ask you, why have Republicans fully accepted the results for the House and the Senate without question but don't accept the results for President, which are all cast on the same ballots? Are they fake ballots or not?

 

And just fucking look around. The ENTIRE world is celebrating this fucker losing. It's like the end of Star Wars when the emperor and Death Star were destroyed. Fucking fireworks and parades all over the globe to the point you would think WWIII just ended.  If the entire planet is this happy, then maybe...JUST MAYBE, you're on the wrong side.

 

 

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
skeptoid's picture

There is no such thing as widespread or large-scale targeted voter fraud.

+1
-3
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dagambit's picture

That is because most states are RED

+1
-2
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000's picture
Master Mind

most densely populated areas are democratic.

https://s3files.core77.com/blog/images/960537_81_90771_DrdO3qFgW.gif

+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dagambit's picture

Is this the where Covid-19 is running rampant chart? I agree. 

+1
-1
-1
Vote comment up/down
boldfart's picture

There should have been a method of avoiding getting these Trumptard fanatics working as ballot checkers!!

+1
-1
-1
Vote comment up/down
skeptoid's picture

See Trooper Trent's comment above - they are there for this reason (this is California - probably differs from State to State but not sure) - incredible room for interpretation here when I read this I was shocked (these are just the general standards - there's language like this for every type of voting tabulation device as well):

 

Section III: General Standards

The following general standards shall apply in the counting of all ballots and votes, regardless of the voting system used, for both the initial count and for any recount.

  1. A ballot that is not marked as provided by law must be segregated and counted in the manner directed by the elections official. Any ballot that contains personal information as defined in section 14287, or that is torn, bent, or mutilated shall be segregated as directed by the elections official and a duplicate ballot shall be prepared pursuant to section 15210. "Personal information" includes: the signature of the voter, the initials, name or address of the voter, a voter identification number, a social security number, or a driver's license number. A ballot that contains marks or markings not related to an indication of the vote choice for a contest and that are not personal information shall be counted. Duplication is not required unless the ballot contains personal information, or the condition of the ballot or markings on the ballot interfere with the ability of the vote tabulation equipment to tally the ballot. (Elections Code sections 13204, 14287, 15154, and 15208.)
  2. A vote for any candidate or ballot measure shall not be rejected solely because the voter failed to follow instructions for marking the ballot. If, for any reason, it is impossible to determine the choice of the voter for any candidate or ballot measure, the vote for that candidate or ballot measure shall be considered void. (Elections Code section 15154.)
  3. A mark is considered valid when it is clear that it represents the voter's choice and is the technique consistently used by the voter to indicate his or her selections. Such marks may include, but are not limited to, properly filled-in voting position targets, checkmarks, X's, circles, completed arrows, or any other clear indication of the voter's choice, such as the word "yes" next to a candidate's name or a voting position target for a ballot measure.
    Conversely, a mark crossed out by the voter, or the word "no" next to a candidate's name or a voting position target for a ballot measure shall not be considered to be a valid vote but will, instead, be deemed an indication that the voter did not choose to cast a vote for that candidate or measure.
  4. In determining the validity of a partially filled-in voting position target, the consistency of a voter's marks on the entire ballot shall be taken into consideration. A "hesitation mark" such as a dot in the voting position target shall not be considered a valid mark unless it is demonstrated that the voter consistently marked his or her ballot in such a manner.
  5. If a contest is marked with more choices than there are offices to be filled or measures that may prevail, the vote shall not be counted for that contest, but shall be counted in all other contests in which there is no overvote and the voter's choice can be clearly determined. (Elections Code section 15154.)
  6. If a contest is marked with fewer choices than there are offices to be filled or measures that may prevail, the vote choice(s) for all otherwise properly marked candidates or measures shall be counted.
  7. Write-in votes are counted pursuant to the provisions established in Elections Code sections 14420, 15342 and 15342.5.
+1
-4
-1
Vote comment up/down
boldfart's picture

Ooops,, apparently Trumptards are well thought of employees.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

trump still losing despite supporters filling in ballots in his favour! 

+1
+3
-1
Vote comment up/down
skeptoid's picture

Are you familiar with the term lawfare?

+1
-4
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

ready........set.........Gooooooo, on your meds!

+1
+3
-1
Vote comment up/down
trooper_trent's picture

Wait until they read about how the recount of a reported "error" actually put Biden even further ahead so they said nevermind.

+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
JTrillo's picture
Beta Tester

Question to Trump supporters, how does it feel to get groomed by a man in his 70s for 4 years that the next election would be fraudulent? Like, seriously, don't you guys have any individual thoughts of your own?

+1
+3
-1
Vote comment up/down
ubershin's picture

honestly the same thing can be said with Demonrats. They are the sheep just the same, just a different team. Nothing new here but at least we are investigating and making sure future elections are better/secure

+1
-5
-1
Vote comment up/down
JTrillo's picture
Beta Tester

Sure you can say what you want, doesn't mean it has any truth behind it. Half the country is crying fraud right now, as if it's impossible that Trump could possibly lose even though there's half a dozen undeniable reasons as to why he lost fair and square.

The only reason Trump won in the first place was because Hillary was so unpopular.

There's no fraud just people pissed at the last 4 years of insanity.

+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

He has a history of that. 

When he was not voted for being presidential candidate in some state he called fraud.
When he was up against clinton he called fraud before they even started counting.

 

Now he asks his voters to donate money for trial whe he actually needs most of it to pay for his campaign debt. 

+1
+2
-1
Vote comment up/down
nakedslave's picture

Said the dude who gets fake news shoved down his gullet. Seriously, do you not have any individual thoughts of your own? or do you get Fake media to shove thoughts down your mindless brain.

 

 

+1
-2
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000's picture
Master Mind

https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/933/835/851.jpg

+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

Yeah, if this is taken to court this will be even funnier!

+1
+2
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

Oh look, it was taken to court, and I was right, it became funnier! And the aftermath became even more entertaining. 

+1
+2
-1
Vote comment up/down
JTrillo's picture
Beta Tester

Wah wah wah fake news fake news wah wah wah. Seriously Trump would spuot so much shit you didn't even need a news source to tell you that. God damn what a whiney little bitch who's so brainwashed by 4 years of Trump you thought that it was so impossible he would lose that it MUST be fraud. Guess what? Here's a bunch of facts that your urine cotton candy hair god didn't mention. 1. Hillary was very unpopular, Biden is popular. 2. Trump's absolute terrible presidency (impeachment, locking kids up in cages, covid response, general inability to form sentences that mean... anything, building a stupid fucking wall that blew down etc). 3. 4 years have passed (a bunch of old republicans dead and 13-17 year olds can now vote). 4. Democratic motivation like nothing that has been seen before. You combine all that shit, it's honestly amazing he did as well as he did.

+1
+2
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dude's picture

The only real representative is our good lord Jezus, noone voted for him

+1
-2
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

This is incorrect. If they voted trump they voted jeebus!

+1
+2
-1
Vote comment up/down
nakedslave's picture

Freedom of speech cancelled by Youtube yet again.

+1
-3
-1
Vote comment up/down
JTrillo's picture
Beta Tester

Freedom of speech doesn't exist in private places or private platforms. Go to the sidewalk and talk shit or start your own shitty website.

+1
+2
-1
Vote comment up/down