They go in not being able to think particularly well, and they come out still like that AND proud to be evil.
(6 votes)
A Conversation with Evil
They go in not being able to think particularly well, and they come out still like that AND proud to be evil.
Comments
(Short Spike)
(Short Spike)
Actualy not true.
Fertilsed embryo are part of the discussion.
Yes it is usualy over looked in most dialouges but since you bring that nuance up, we can address it.
Human life begins and conception, that is the argument.
You just went to the location argument, which doesnt hold water.
(Short Spike)
(Short Spike)
Ok, It is hypocritical to hold a prolife stance and not to have a problem with embryo harvesting.
The real problem is when the discarding occurs, up untill that point there is a reasonable hope for life. Even then the entire practice is so fraught with ethical problems that partaking in the practice in any form is not advisable.
Any pro lifer who has no problem with embryo harvesting is obvoiusly a hyporcrate.
It sounded like you were suggesting all pro lifers are guilty of this.
In fact it sounded like you were arguing that a frozen embryo in a lab proves the pro choice position that untill born a baby is not a person (the location argument).
Its good to hear someone bring it up and I am absolutley against such fertility practices.
Lets take it to the next level and discuss how many contraceptives prevent a fertilized egg from attaching to the utereian wall thereby provoking a spontaneous abortion. Most people are not aware that this happens and even when challenged on this, they prefer to look the other way.
Again Hypocrates
(Short Spike)
(Old Spike)
Pro lifers are idiots.
Neither state nor church has the right to decide over a person's body.
Like it or not an unborn child is part of another person's body, this person only should be allowed to take a decision about it.
Note to the deluded:
This does not mean that I condone abortion at 8 or 9 months. I simply don't have a say in it.
(Old Spike)
But you have had a say in it - read your comment. The state decides over people's bodies all the time.
(Old Spike)
Well it shouldn't in cases like pregnancy, suicide or others where only ONE person is concerned. This goes for a limited extent for drugs too, like fgor example driving under the influence.
(Short Spike)
Daftcunt you are truly a daft cunt.
You just keep running with the same old tired tropes like its some kind of argument.
It is obvious that your opinions were given to you for repition without any scrutiny.
The my body my choice argument is wrong in its premise.
And then you finish off with - I simply dont have a say in it - why? because you are not female?
Actualy you are self censoring because you have been told to, and like a good little dog boy you comply.
You would have made a model German in 1938.
You think you are on the right side of history while you support the wholesale slaughter of the innocents.
YOU ARE THE IDIOT.
(Old Spike)
Like I said, the comment was not aimed at the deluded.
"The my body my choice argument is wrong in its premise."
what exactly is wrong about it?
"why?" because it is not MY body
"You would have made a model German in 1938.
You think you are on the right side of history while you support the wholesale slaughter of the innocents."
Sorry, quite the opposite actually, but you wouldn't know that so here goes: The people you refer to in Nazi Germany did NOT have a say or control over their own bodies in a similar fashion as you propagate.
(Old Spike)
So as expected no reply, hence the "my body" argument isn't flawed at all......
(Old Spike)
Sorry, typo correction:
"like NOT for example for driving under the influence."
(Old Spike)
We endlessly search the universe, hopeful for any signs of intelligent life or extra-terrestrial civilisations, yet consider the ability to terminate inevitable intelligent life in the womb on Earth an intellectual victory.
(Old Spike)
inevitablepotentially intelligent life(Short Spike)
Most pro-lifers are extreme hypocrites.
(Old Spike)
Baby killers turns me on.
(Old Spike)
Adult sexually play with baby = bad
Adult Murders baby = good
Great logic
(Short Spike)
How is it murder if it's legal?
(Old Spike)
That argument failed at Nuremberg.
(Short Spike)
Not an argument, just the wrong definition of the word.
(Old Spike)
The Nazi killings were legal in Germany at the time. A separate entity determined that the wrong word was being used - they weren't killings they were murders. Many were hung. Surprised you didn't know this.
(Short Spike)
So you want to base our language on a country, taken over by a dictator, and went to war with the rest of the continent the best part of a centaury ago? Murder IS a legal term, it's illegal killing, that is how the word is defined. I'm not saying that just because something wasn't murder, it means it's ok. I'm just saying abortion =/= murder. I'm surprised you doesn't know what the definition of the word is, I'd have assumed you'd have looked it up by now. There's also many better words to use to describe what happened in Nazi Germany, genocide being one of them. Using the word murder to describe what happened in Nazi German discredits what actually happened.
(Old Spike)
Nobody is murdering anyone, a fetus is removed from a body.