This is hilarious. They agreed 3 topics beforehand, but once cornered of course the twat tries to divert, using the repertoire of climate bullshit bingo including "it's a hoax" and "spike of doom" even mentions "free speech". They were supposed to to discuss potholers criticism of using a modified warming graph in the movie rather than the one from the study they refer to.
The funniest bit is that the denier asks in the beginning to keep answers brief (impossible when having a scientific discussion) and not to interrupt or "filibuster" but hilariously fails a it himself.
(3 votes)
Comments
(Old Spike)
Denying doom makes life more comfortable, who wants to admit we will all burn?
(Old Spike)
For those who can't be bothered to watch the rest of the "debate", here's an executive summary: