American Troops GTFO! - Million-Man March in Baghdad

danmanjones's picture

Iraqis hold march against US in 'millions' in Baghdad | Iraq | Baghdad | #MillionManMarch

Iraqis in the streets in a "million-man march" in Baghdad to protest against the US troop presence in Iraq.

 

They are asking nicely (this time). It would be wise to take the hint.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Muqtada al-Sadr, 3rd from left, standing with heads of some Iraqi Militia in Iran's holy city of Qom last week.

 

Al-Sadr, arguably the most powerful Iraqi political figure, called for this march to send a message to Washington.

 

Since the assassination of General Soleimani & Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, al-Sadr has re-activated the Mahdi Army & called on all foreign forces to leave Iraq.

 

Al-Sadr's party won the most number of seats in the May 2018 parliament elections. He's an Iraqi nationalist, averse to US & Iranian influence in Iraq.

 

NYTimes -- The rally is supported by mainstream Shiite parties, including al-Sadr's political rival Hadi al-Ameri, who heads the Fatah bloc in parliament, as well as the Popular Mobilization Units, an umbrella group comprised of an array of militias, including Iran-backed groups.

 

0
No votes yet

Comments

danmanjones's picture

Some numbers:

During the height of the insurgency in 2006-2007, American-led occupation forces aimed at a ratio of 3:1 & with ~170,000 troops.

Right now the US-led forces number under 10,000.

The Mahdi Army is 10,000-50,000 strong and there are a further ~150,000 battle-hardened PMF militia men who would likely go hard, particularly since the US martyred 2 of their favourite generals.

 

Both sides have increased tech capabilities since the height of the US occupation of Iraq - American drones warfare has been enhanced & so have the militia's weaponry.

 

TLDR; US-led forces are sitting ducks.

 

The US would need around 500,000 troops to have a chance of holding on if it gets hot. If it kicks off this year I suspect it'll be worse than last time. Leaving while under attack seems politically untenable for the US but wold be a real dilemma because there's no real American national interest in occupying that country.

 

How many more Americans will die for this freak's rapture fantasy?

+1
-1
-1
Vote comment up/down
lawngnome's picture

The Gulf War (2 August 1990 – 28 February 1991) , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_War

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Pompeo , starts his career in 2010....

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
danmanjones's picture

That's not the point. The point is that Pompeo is one of the key people in power right now who's trying to keep US forces in Iraq & even spark an unwinnable war with Iran, it seems. None of this makes sense rwt US national interest.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
danmanjones's picture

Western media... lol

 

Pic from a previous protest ^

 

There's nothing "radical" about Muqtada al-Sadr. He's about the most rational & well-versed political figures in Iraq, not to mention the most influencial. Western media always calls him "firebrand" etc. It's laughable. USA truly is the United States of Amnesia.

 

"anti-government"?

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
danmanjones's picture

LOL

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
danmanjones's picture

US-backed agent provoceteurs hold parallel "protest" on a bridge to pull media attention away from the million-man march. Western media can now conflate to 2 & the CIA can keep up pressuring on the Iraqi government. Western media will report heavily on the casualties from these color-revolution protests to use the humanitarian grounds as a way to delegitemize the Iraqi govt. It paves the way to sanctions & other neat stuff in the name of "freedom & democracy"

Notice the similarities between these guys & the Hong Kong "protesters"?

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Pantysoaker's picture
front page

What do u call a basemnet full of libtards? a whine celler

+1
+2
-1
Vote comment up/down
danmanjones's picture
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down