idk it makes sense to me. which team is the "greatest" is open for debate, depending on what you think makes a team great. some would argue that the yankees aren't the greatest because although they have a lot of wins they also have the most money by far, and by that metric they're only average not great. an encylopedia should be factual information, not a collection of essays. people are free to take any of wikipedia's information and then write that the yankees are great or mao was cruel.
Comments
(Old Spike)
idk it makes sense to me. which team is the "greatest" is open for debate, depending on what you think makes a team great. some would argue that the yankees aren't the greatest because although they have a lot of wins they also have the most money by far, and by that metric they're only average not great. an encylopedia should be factual information, not a collection of essays. people are free to take any of wikipedia's information and then write that the yankees are great or mao was cruel.