Trying a bumpfire slidestock

BabyDuckling's picture

Lisa Jean AR15 Bump Fire

I forgot to add a description!

4.4
Average: 4.4 (5 votes)

Comments

Grothesk's picture

So these things are or aren't illegal?  

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
BabyDuckling's picture

They are legal,  nothing mechanical inside the weapon is auto firing.  The trigger just happens to be bumping against your finger.  I've done this a few times with my mini 14 without a stock like that one.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
skeptoid's picture

What exactly is your position on gun control?

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Fullauto223cal's picture

Do you really have to ask that question?  I'm going to guess and say he has become a big fan of that hypocritical cunt Jimmy Kimmel as of late.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
BabyDuckling's picture

Same reason this is legal: 

Image result for trigger crank auto

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Fullauto223cal's picture

Legal and FUCKING FUN AS HELL from what it seems.

 

+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
eh's picture

I've fired one too and was stunned that they are legal. It was an AR-15 like hers without all the bells and whistles. The rate of fire made me think of a WW1 machinegun, kind of slow compared to say an MG42 or modern fully automatic assault rifle rates. Obviously fast enough to slaughter 50+ people in a crowd and wound 500, so plenty fast enough.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
PizzaBoi's picture

I want to bump my fire into her slide-stock

+1
+2
-1
Vote comment up/down
Fullauto223cal's picture

There's one thing you will not hear gun grabbers saying about bumpfire, they make aiming all but fucking impossible.

 

Every fucking time with left.  Let's blame the thing, not the person.  For fuck sake.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Grothesk's picture

So you're trying to say Stephen Paddock would have been able to inflict the casualties he did with a shotgun or a 6-shooter revolver?  I like how you jizz all over your hands by saying guns are just tools but then you ignore how powerful a tool they are.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Fullauto223cal's picture

Nope I didn't say that at all.  I will say that at least he didn't take a page from the Islamist killers. He could have inflicted far more death by renting a large truck and driving into the crowd like they're doing in Europe.

 

Why are you fantasizing about me cumming on my hands?  Weirdo.

 

Firearms are tools.  They're not as powerful as you believe.  As we've seen in Europe, a rental truck can kill far more people in a shorter ammount of time.

 

In May, a bomb attack killed 23 people at an Ariana Grande concert in Manchester, England.  I assume England has laws against making bombs.

 

A series of attacks in and around Paris by bombers and gunmen in November 2015 killed 130 people, including 89 at an Eagles of Death Metal concert.  89 people gun downed in the gun control utopia of France.

 

I will also point out that NO LAW proposed by the hypocritical gun control cucks who sleep under the protection of armed guards would have stopped this son of bitch from doing what he did.

 

We live in an armed society.  It's part and parcel of living in a truly free society.  If you don't like it then you're in the wrong country, I'm sorry.  A nation of 380+ million people is bound to include a hand full of psychopathic individuals who will take advantage of their freedoms to inflict death on others.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sato's picture

trucks aren't as powerful as you think. for that type of attack to work people would need to be on the street, and packed close enough they can't get out the way. there is no turning around for another pass, and it also has to be a straight road and completely clear of traffic and other barriers. that situation is pretty rare. if trucks are the way to go, why aren't more people doing that? they're not because that's much harder than buying guns and shooting people.

 

the paris attacks were carried out by a group of people aided by a much larger support network. anything less and it would've failed, thanks to restricted access to the most deadly weapons. in america if you want to kill a lot of people you don't need anyone to help you smuggle weapons over the border. there's no risk at all of being stopped until you point the trigger, because until then all you're doing in carrying guns, which is legal. gun laws don't seek to end violence and death, they seek to reduce it, and they do this by reducing the amount of carnage any one person can acheive at any given time. if the best a terror network can acheive is 23 dead, that's a win, many times better than if each person in the team has ready access to guns and manages to kill 10 each.

 

it isn't part and parcel with a free society. societies without access to arms but not any and all kinds of arms have more freedoms. unrestricted access takes away more rights than it gives.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dagambit's picture

Bumpfire stocks are illegal in Oklahoma. Where we have open carry and no magazine limit. I may have assumed they were illegal everywhere. For that I apologize. I still cannot find an accurate site explaining or citing the law for Las Vegas. "Everything on google now reads bumpfire is legal and here's technically why... only banned in California." <--- which is bullshit. 

If you find it first drop a link in here, I am tired of looking right now if it isn't in the first few results on the 1 page. 

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
StarturtleZero's picture

Regardless of your stance on gun control, that's a real fast way to go through money.  All I can think about when she's holding down the trigger is WOW, that gun fires at $200/minute

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
BabyDuckling's picture

Kellyanne Conway is blaming the Obama Administration for not regulating Bump-Stocks.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down