'Daesh was threatening to take Damascus.
That's why Russia came in.
We saw it coming too, but thought we could use it to force Assad to negotiate...'
'The Russians have changed the equation, unfortunately'
That is the essence of Kerry's comments here.
Kerry's comments came at a meeting that took place at the Dutch Mission to the United Nations on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly last September (2016). Full leaked audio: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4phB-_pXDM
Full details about the US's Operation in Syria (Operation Timber Sycamore):
https://www.spikednation.com/videos/operation-timber-sycamore
(6 votes)
Comments
(Long Spike)
Fucking dirtbag. Good post 5/5
(Old Spike)
(Old Spike)
The emperor has lost both his clothes and his skin.
(Old Spike)
is this why all the "russia hacked our elections" bs was tried?
(Old Spike)
Yeah I do think it has a lot to do with it. Russia exposed the US strategy & pissed off the shadow state.
The investigation of "Russia hacking" boils down to some social media posts viewed by less than 200k people & some pen testing on local governments. It's contrived.
See Putin's comments from late 2014 (skip to 2:00)
(Long Spike)
How dare he... truly outrageous. (((SHADOW STATE))) confirmed, if you ask me.
Much more outrageous than 207,000 civilians being killed in Syria, between March 2011 and March 2017, including 24,000 children and 23,000 females. Oh, and 94% of the victims were killed by the Syrian-Iranian-Russian Alliance.
(Old Spike)
How dare he... truly outrageous.
So you back Kerry's strategy of supporting jihadis in Syria?......the people who round up Christians & Shia Muslims & chop their heads off - they'd chop your head off without thinking twice. Your hate-boner for Assad has made you crazy in the head my man.
You're quoting figures from the propaganda arm of the head-chopping jihadis.
Like its SOHR, SNHR is based in UK & run by one person. In both cases the domain name is registered in the US & the name of the registrant is not made public. [1][2]
Here's a simple graphic debunking your source. gg
(Long Spike)
So you can delete comments, huh? That's a nice little feature to have, when you talk so much nonsense and apparently can't read that well.
You really got me good with that sick infographic. NATO-Jihadist. I'd ask you to read their methodology, but I have serious doubt in your ability of comprehension. To be expected from a fellow, who regards an actress with fake nails scratching at stickers as a compelling argument.
Again you appear to be nothing more than a полезный дурак. Even the people that manipulate your opinions to serve their interests think of you as a fool. You are just another boring conspiracy nut, whose opinion is up for the taking to anyone masquarading as anti-establishment. gg no re
(Old Spike)
The comment was removed because it added nothing to the convo, not to deceive. The wrong organisation was debunked in the first instance. Both organisations are just as ridiculous as each other & share a lot of similarities.
I did read their methodology. The data is collected from activists. It ignores the Syrian government's data. I also read that the U.N. used their data in a report but has since ignored it because it's too sketchy.
It's public knowledge that NATO + GCC countries are have funded, armed & trained the opposition so 'NATO-jihadist' is accurate.
All you have in response are silly insults. "can't read", "fool", "conspiracy nut". You talk a lot but say nothing.
(Long Spike)
Oh, ok then. Still you deleted your own comments, as well as mine. Hiding your shame of not being able to read and then messing with other people's comments. Didn't know you were an admin here and could do such things. I guess censorship get's packaged along with white-washing authoritarian crimes. Just like when you embarrased yourself with that map legend of Syrian government attacks on medical facilities.
Anything showing the crimes of Assad and Putin in Syria is fake. Good enough for the UN, but not good enough for you. They are open about the limitations and the basis of their data. This is written specifically before every report they make. Multiple sources have reported on your favorite tyrants' armies targeting civilians in Syria. Your domain argument is pretty strong though, so I am a bit puzzled. /s I realize that I might aswell watch RT and get all your opinions from there. However, at the same time I know it is an authoritarian states' media channel, so I don't think I will delve into this cognitive dissonance and wilfully watch Kremlin propaganda.
Well, you really are a полезный дурак. Not an insult, if it indeed is a proven fact at this point. Own it with pride.
Could you kindly point out the obvious lies in this -
Get out some more, enjoy nature. Read this about yourself.