Being of the Red Sea Pedestrian faith (Very Lapsed!) I do not have this problem.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Long Spike)
if you were rating villains. how would you rate a doctor that kidnaps circumcised men, operates on them to restore their foreskin and only releases them once everything is healed?
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Bobbob (Site Administrator)
An operation doesn't exist, sadly, on account of this skin needing to be double-sided, a skin graft won't do, if you get me. It's a cumbersome process involving straps and such to elongate the bit of foreskin that's left. Folks that do this (and their wives) seem to have good things to say, though, particularly increased sensitivity and enjoyment.
+1
-1
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Long Spike)
skin needing to be double-sided ... are you familiar with the ancient art of folding?
if you fold a skin graft on itself, the skins double-sided and the operation exists
+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
Bobbob (Site Administrator)
I'll defer to your wisdom. Just wondering if the resulting thickness will be restrictive and undesirable. Plus remember that only the foreskin or remaining foreskin on the penis will qualify as erectile tissue and have the desired elasticity. I'm not sure the operation which you say exists, would. I mean, they'd have to over-compensate, make the diameter extra big and baggy, wouldn't they?
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Nakey (Site Administrator)
4 comments and no votes?
arsehol... wait, dicks!
+1
+2
-1
Vote comment up/down
n0val33t (Old Spike)
I can only reason, everyone scrambled to wash their junk and forgot to rate it!.....
+1
+2
-1
Vote comment up/down
Nakey (Site Administrator)
i like that one.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Bobbob (Site Administrator)
Dunno if I like the idea of folks needing a video to remind them to do this. Make this a natural part of shower time and you won't remember the last time you saw smeg.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Long Spike)
you ever think about how not voting is basically like voting a 3? if 1 is the lowest and 5 is the highest, 3 is kind of middle ground. voting takes more effort than not. someone might like the video or not but chooses not to vote. what they would vote is unknown but would average out to a 3. then taking into consideration that the only times someones voting a 1 is usually done out of spite.. the true rating system is more or less 2, 3(no vote), 4, 5
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Nakey (Site Administrator)
That's all well and good but the concept of how this site works revolves around points and voting.
+1
+2
-1
Vote comment up/down
Bobbob (Site Administrator)
Agree, but you'll need to follow-up with Merlock. Lately there's a bug cropping up (around out of 3 times) where you log in, select an interesting video and get booted out (meaning back to logged-out status). I'm thinking it's only us more persistent ones wanting to say something that grunt and log back in.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Long Spike)
you're not getting logged out. most of the time you're on https://www.spiked.... and sometimes a link will send you to https://spiked... it's been like that for a while
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Nakey (Site Administrator)
we need to have a team meeting and table what needs to be looked at.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Bobbob (Site Administrator)
Ok. Book it.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Nakey (Site Administrator)
Damn, somebody put on the big boy pants this morning.
Okey dokes boss.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Bobbob (Site Administrator)
Just reading your comment Sal. If people find the video informative, they like the production quality or had a laugh I think they'll usually give it a 4 or 5, which basically translates into 'more please '. I'd hope after the downvote wars around COVID time things have settled down and folks are giving one-star to videos that just plain suck. If folks are still one-starring videos out of spite as you say.. associated with the poster as opposed to the content, well.. everyone needs a hobby I guess. I'd sooner just not vote when that's the case. What you say does make a case for a mandatory comment on one-star votes, however.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Long Spike)
you ever one star a video because you were arguing with the poster? or the video was critical of something/someone you like? or you didn't like the source of the video?
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Bobbob (Site Administrator)
We're gonna do whataboutism? I'll answer your questions.
No. Though I've abstained to vote at times, I think we agree on that. Other times I've shocked said user by giving one of their vids 5 stars while we disputed on some other thread.
Yes if critical and unsubstantiated. No if critical but had concrete facts. Been pleasantly surprised with new info at times.
Yes for not liking the source. eg. Jimmy Doore videos where he's proven that his only point is to drum up controversy. I think by counterexample we've got folks on here that one-star videos coming from that young microbiologist (MD with the nice fro) also on the COVID issue.
You should take the time to vote on content you view is all I'm saying, since this helps modulate content on the site.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Long Spike)
you ever five star something because someone gave something a one? or gave something a five because a third party is going to react negatively to it?
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Bobbob (Site Administrator)
I think you use your brain too much. Try and relax. You do you I guess.
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Pdub (Old Spike)
That second video....1:59
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Bobbob (Site Administrator)
When the apostles first approached the gentiles/ Greeks about becoming Christian, they were asked to be circumcised. For the Greeks this was a deal-breaker, proposing that they were entering into a new covenant with God through Jesus, so ...no. They came to an agreement and that's why many of ya'll remain intact.
You're welcome.
+1
-1
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Long Spike)
probably why we lost the holy wars. the other team was willing to commit to perpetual sports mode
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Bobbob (Site Administrator)
By other team you mean the Arabs and the Jews?? They're both circumcized aren't they. Along with some tribes in Africa where the practice started. I'm not sure. I mean, doesn't it chafe rubbing against your shorts like that? Millions of years of evolution, here's a fully eversible protective casing for the most delicate bit, you'll like this one. No, no, the other way is much more sporty! Sure, it's a cultural preference (also meant to discourage chronic wanking, apparently), but to call it 'uncircumcized' would indeed involve a graft from the back of your leg as you describe above. IMHO, there is 'in-tact' and then there's 'circumicized'. That's all.
Comments
(Dixie Normous: Image specialist)
Mild soap? I've been using acetone and steel wool
(Site Administrator)
(Long Spike)
Being of the Red Sea Pedestrian faith (Very Lapsed!) I do not have this problem.
(Long Spike)
if you were rating villains. how would you rate a doctor that kidnaps circumcised men, operates on them to restore their foreskin and only releases them once everything is healed?
(Site Administrator)
An operation doesn't exist, sadly, on account of this skin needing to be double-sided, a skin graft won't do, if you get me. It's a cumbersome process involving straps and such to elongate the bit of foreskin that's left. Folks that do this (and their wives) seem to have good things to say, though, particularly increased sensitivity and enjoyment.
(Long Spike)
skin needing to be double-sided ... are you familiar with the ancient art of folding?
if you fold a skin graft on itself, the skins double-sided and the operation exists
(Site Administrator)
I'll defer to your wisdom. Just wondering if the resulting thickness will be restrictive and undesirable. Plus remember that only the foreskin or remaining foreskin on the penis will qualify as erectile tissue and have the desired elasticity. I'm not sure the operation which you say exists, would. I mean, they'd have to over-compensate, make the diameter extra big and baggy, wouldn't they?
(Site Administrator)
4 comments and no votes?
arsehol... wait, dicks!
(Old Spike)
I can only reason, everyone scrambled to wash their junk and forgot to rate it!.....
(Site Administrator)
i like that one.
(Site Administrator)
Dunno if I like the idea of folks needing a video to remind them to do this. Make this a natural part of shower time and you won't remember the last time you saw smeg.
(Long Spike)
you ever think about how not voting is basically like voting a 3? if 1 is the lowest and 5 is the highest, 3 is kind of middle ground. voting takes more effort than not. someone might like the video or not but chooses not to vote. what they would vote is unknown but would average out to a 3. then taking into consideration that the only times someones voting a 1 is usually done out of spite.. the true rating system is more or less 2, 3(no vote), 4, 5
(Site Administrator)
That's all well and good but the concept of how this site works revolves around points and voting.
(Site Administrator)
Agree, but you'll need to follow-up with Merlock. Lately there's a bug cropping up (around out of 3 times) where you log in, select an interesting video and get booted out (meaning back to logged-out status). I'm thinking it's only us more persistent ones wanting to say something that grunt and log back in.
(Long Spike)
you're not getting logged out. most of the time you're on https://www.spiked.... and sometimes a link will send you to https://spiked... it's been like that for a while
(Site Administrator)
we need to have a team meeting and table what needs to be looked at.
(Site Administrator)
Ok. Book it.
(Site Administrator)
Damn, somebody put on the big boy pants this morning.
Okey dokes boss.
(Site Administrator)
Just reading your comment Sal. If people find the video informative, they like the production quality or had a laugh I think they'll usually give it a 4 or 5, which basically translates into 'more please '. I'd hope after the downvote wars around COVID time things have settled down and folks are giving one-star to videos that just plain suck. If folks are still one-starring videos out of spite as you say.. associated with the poster as opposed to the content, well.. everyone needs a hobby I guess. I'd sooner just not vote when that's the case. What you say does make a case for a mandatory comment on one-star votes, however.
(Long Spike)
you ever one star a video because you were arguing with the poster? or the video was critical of something/someone you like? or you didn't like the source of the video?
(Site Administrator)
We're gonna do whataboutism? I'll answer your questions.
No. Though I've abstained to vote at times, I think we agree on that. Other times I've shocked said user by giving one of their vids 5 stars while we disputed on some other thread.
Yes if critical and unsubstantiated. No if critical but had concrete facts. Been pleasantly surprised with new info at times.
Yes for not liking the source. eg. Jimmy Doore videos where he's proven that his only point is to drum up controversy. I think by counterexample we've got folks on here that one-star videos coming from that young microbiologist (MD with the nice fro) also on the COVID issue.
You should take the time to vote on content you view is all I'm saying, since this helps modulate content on the site.
(Long Spike)
you ever five star something because someone gave something a one? or gave something a five because a third party is going to react negatively to it?
(Site Administrator)
I think you use your brain too much. Try and relax. You do you I guess.
(Old Spike)
That second video....1:59
(Site Administrator)
When the apostles first approached the gentiles/ Greeks about becoming Christian, they were asked to be circumcised. For the Greeks this was a deal-breaker, proposing that they were entering into a new covenant with God through Jesus, so ...no. They came to an agreement and that's why many of ya'll remain intact.
You're welcome.
(Long Spike)
probably why we lost the holy wars. the other team was willing to commit to perpetual sports mode
(Site Administrator)
By other team you mean the Arabs and the Jews?? They're both circumcized aren't they. Along with some tribes in Africa where the practice started. I'm not sure. I mean, doesn't it chafe rubbing against your shorts like that? Millions of years of evolution, here's a fully eversible protective casing for the most delicate bit, you'll like this one. No, no, the other way is much more sporty! Sure, it's a cultural preference (also meant to discourage chronic wanking, apparently), but to call it 'uncircumcized' would indeed involve a graft from the back of your leg as you describe above. IMHO, there is 'in-tact' and then there's 'circumicized'. That's all.