M240 Machine Gun used at Vegas?

Comments

eh's picture

Comment sections on the hundreds of conspiracy videos are not to be missed. The fact that there are so many fucktard morons in this country needs to be fully understood.

 

This whole thing STINKS. It shouldn't even be a debate at this point. It's so obvious there's a massive cover-up coming from very high up in American gov.

 

Everyone knows the security guard was the shooter. Paddock was just a Patsy

 

Definitely belt-fed weapon. FBI ISIS deal gone wrong?

 

It sounds like an AK-47 to me. That has the same 600 rpm rate. Two windows were broken out in two separate places. If you are alone, why have two shooting positions? No, it is more likely that two people were there, and they needed two firing positions. One shooter kills the patsy before escaping.

 

From the first time i heard the shooting video i knew its wasn't a modified semi auto rifle. This is good comparable proof to show. Thank you for your work brother.

 

That's not a conspiracy. The Left always talks about banning "assault" rifles because they think they're machine guns. I don't think they're going to kick down doors or anything but the legislation has been introduced.

 

 

CIA Agents were the real shooters.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
phanto's picture

Fun education time:

 

- M240 machineguns are chambered in 7.62x51mm and use belted ammunition with disentegrating links, which means it leaves 7.62 brass and links all over the place where it is fired. It also leaves 7.62 projectiles into people and all over the beaten zone where it fired. Using one of these to simulate fire from a magazine fed rifle chambered in .223 is a terrible idea. Especially when an army of doctors and forensic investigators will get to find and examine the projectiles, brass and links. People will probably find bullets in that field for decades to come.

 

- The rate of fire of a bump fire stock will vary with the weight of the weapon and how much strength the firer uses to pull it forward.

 

Someone tell that to those youtube idiots. I'm too lazy. 

+1
+3
-1
Vote comment up/down
BabyDuckling's picture

well  stated.

+1
-1
-1
Vote comment up/down
thegent's picture

Im not entirely sure what the argument is here? i know nothing about guns why does it matter what gun he used?

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
eh's picture

It's about coming up with a conspiracy, not about facts.

+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
thegent's picture

ah ok, well i suppose if you ask yourself.. could i in amerca (if i was crazy) get some guns, bring them to a hotel and fire at some people down below? If the answer is yes, then i suppose he could have done it alone..

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down