it's a pre-print (not peer-reviewed) at this point.
scientists tend to take pre-prints with a grain of salt since they can contain flaws.
it's also not really a "Johns Hopkins study".
+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
skeptoid (Old Spike)
Standford, Oxford, Cambridge, and now John Hopkins.
LMAO - Dan?
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
danman (Site Administrator)
if there was any chance you had a clue what you're talking about I'd ask you for sources.
+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
skeptoid (Old Spike)
LMAO - you already know the sources, and you know what they concluded. When you "ask for sources" you are feigning ignorance in the hope that the person you are communicating with will not know what they are.
You actually know the sources Dan - why don't you name them for us right here, right now?
+1
-1
-1
Vote comment up/down
sato (Old Spike)
BS lockdowns have been incredibly effective, at enriching big business and empoverishing 90% of everyone else.
Comments
(Site Administrator)
there's some valid criticisms of the paper here
it's a pre-print (not peer-reviewed) at this point.
scientists tend to take pre-prints with a grain of salt since they can contain flaws.
it's also not really a "Johns Hopkins study".
(Old Spike)
Standford, Oxford, Cambridge, and now John Hopkins.
LMAO - Dan?
(Site Administrator)
if there was any chance you had a clue what you're talking about I'd ask you for sources.
(Old Spike)
LMAO - you already know the sources, and you know what they concluded. When you "ask for sources" you are feigning ignorance in the hope that the person you are communicating with will not know what they are.
You actually know the sources Dan - why don't you name them for us right here, right now?
(Old Spike)
BS lockdowns have been incredibly effective, at enriching big business and empoverishing 90% of everyone else.