kraken uses the tucker defense

Comments

Dagambit's picture

Yeah, I will wait on this one. Her comment is taken way out of context. It isn't fact because it isn't proven. Lawyer's terms. Give Dominion 3 months of hiding machines, protected by the establishment, not letting anyone inspect it. Then after all the clean up, and only then, defend yourself and counter sue. Nothing to see here. Just Maddow's network, probably going to blame Russia somehow in a few weeks. 

 

Questions and observations:

Why are there percentages in the votes. There are no .04 people. 

Why weren't the machines allowed to be inspected? The few that were lent for inspection show counting off over the margine of error. 

The machines despite the law were hooked up to the internet. Not allowed, fear of tampering.

Same machines Democrats and Republican alike raised concerns over in 2016-2018. What changed?  

+1
-5
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

"Her comment is taken way out of context. It isn't fact because it isn't proven."

 

Well, she presented it as fact claiming to actually have proof for fraud. scotus disagreed (of course) so there is an argument for defamation.

 

"Lawyer's terms." 

 

Well, if she would have used lawyer's terminology to begin with her statements would have been way less "headliney" and provocative and there would not have been a case for this.

 

This will be settled out of court.

 

As to your last paragraph: Asked, answered, thrown out of court. 

+1
+5
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dagambit's picture

She has evidence, that STILL hasn't been seen by the courts. It hasn't been proven as fact. Again, I will wait, I am betting Dominion doesn't move forward with their suit, because they don't want to go to court. This same headline was back in Janurary and nothing has changed. She can present FACTS, but not the conclusion, it is up to Dominion to PROVE the design was that way, or that her facts didn't happen. 

 

They could have came after her for slander back in November, but they didn't. They waited months after dispersing like rats and running like hell, and only after the democrats were able to shield their equipment from spot checks they now, feel embolden to take her on. Again, I don't think they want to go to court. This is just headline news to further the talking point, and it will disappear. I could be wrong, I just don't logically see why it is played out this way? It was an easy swat if she was lying and had nothing and an easy suit plus a paycheck for the slander. 

 

Check back in a few months, see if this just gets swept under the rug or if she get massacured in court. Definitley keep posting, I am interested in which way this ultimately goes. 

+1
-4
-1
Vote comment up/down
Bobbob's picture

You're wrong, friend. Dominion's lawyers have 2 things to prove. That her claims are false AND that she knew her claims were false when she made them. She's just admitted to both. She's most-thoroughly f#@ked. Hope the house is in the husband's name.

+1
+5
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dagambit's picture

True, if the statement by this network is accurate. No one else is reporting on this soo... out of context most likely. Remember Jussie Smolett? Russia Hoax? MSNBC has lost a lot of credibility with me. 

+1
-2
-1
Vote comment up/down
Bobbob's picture

You kidding? CNN Don Lemmon's left eyebrow shot up so high it nearly knocked him off his chair last night, heheh. Oh, sorry, you meant real news. 

+1
+3
-1
Vote comment up/down
skeptoid's picture

No reasonable person would get their news from MSNBC. There's plenty of unreasonableness to go around. How do we solve this? Welcome back!

+1
-2
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

Yeah, only when beanyhat reads the news to you it is believeable. 

 

You, karenoid, are the living caricature of a human being.

+1
+3
-1
Vote comment up/down
nakedslave's picture

The diferrence with mister Beenie hat is. He facts check almost 100% of the time. Every subject that is being mention is fact check. 

 

You cannot say the same for your CNN News and MSN News ABC. They are riddles with yearly Retractions. Meaning they have fake news narrative left and right without any fact check.

+1
-5
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

"He facts check almost 100% of the time. Every subject that is being mention is fact check. "

 

This is hillarious on so many levels! Thank you!

 

+1
+6
-1
Vote comment up/down
skeptoid's picture

You consistently signal when you've got nothing to offer in terms of an argument. Tim reads articles from the mainstream sources that you tout and then he does the work that you don't do because as you admit you're lazy and stupid. You don't have to agree with everything Tim says in terms of his fact-checking analysis but he actually undertakes the effort and you do not.

+1
-5
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

"Tim reads articles from the mainstream sources...." 

 

And the karenoid and other fanboys needs articles read to him soas to know what their opinion is, I and others that can have their own thoughts and opinions and can read.....

+1
+4
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dagambit's picture

DAFTCUNT only like news from 1 source. There is no fact checking unless they do it. Keep your multiple articles and free thinking.. No matter how many times Daftcunt is wrong, he is still right. 

+1
-3
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

beanyhat, crowder, door etc. are not news sources, they are opinion channels where people like you get theirs nicely packaged for consumption and spread. I also NEVER have submitted any "news" from FOX, CNN or the likes other than for their comedic value. 

+1
+2
-1
Vote comment up/down
skeptoid's picture

Whether something is believable to me or not depends on whether the facts that the thing is based on are real and verifiable. I've listed the various sources that I use when I'm trying to make sense of what's actually going on here many times. and the point that I have made many times is that if you just get your news from Fox or you just get your news from MSNBC you're obviously not going to have a very good idea of what's actually going on. You project so often that I kind of feel like your ultimate calling in life would have been to work in that role at a movie theater.

+1
-4
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

Yeah I would believe you if you actually would post different sources but you don't. Fox, beanyhat and that is pretty much it. 

+1
+6
-1
Vote comment up/down
skeptoid's picture

I post from Rising I post the darkhorse podcast I post material from reason I post material from Jimmy door I occasionally post material from secular talk and I post material from Tulsi Gabbard wherever she happens to be being interviewed. There are many other examples of the diversity of opinion that I post here. What do they all have in common though? All of them see your religion of wokeism for precisely what it is. The only entity that belongs to Fox News whose content I consume is Tucker Carlson and then only when an interesting clip appears in my YouTube feed. You can tell the person who posted here is religiously slaved to this one particular source because we've seen this person comment and their analysis comes straight from this particular source with no other sources impinging on the sense making apparatus. You are the same. Many others here are the same. What we can count on is that posting any source that calls for a reasonable coming together of reasonable people from all non-insane quadrants of the political spectrum can be guaranteed to be aggressively attacked by you and the other persons here who are possessed by the ideological quasi religious cult known as wokeism. That's the primary monolithic constant here and it's a trend that anyone can see.

+1
-8
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

Yes, I forgot door. You exclusively post shit that has some sort of opinion attached to it.

+1
+4
-1
Vote comment up/down
Dagambit's picture

Daftcunt, you might learn something if you try watching different sources and videos instead of just drive-by 1 starring everything that doesn't fit in your world view. 

 

Joe Biden < TRUMP

Spreading Covid in the US by allowing Illegals into the US knowing they have COVID  

Erected cages for children and adults crossing the border in his new building, that he restricted access to, that the workers had to leak how bad they were.

Changing terminology to not look like a failure  - Crisis into Challenge

Newly built detention centers with bars on the windows - to keep kids in an overly occupied space, allow to shower and see daylight once a week. HOLY SHIT STRAIGHT UP NAZI CAMPS

 

^ this is happening while you are focused on Sydney Powell. I will wait for the retraction on MSNBC, but lately they are wrong and just double down, then eventually blame Russia. 

+1
-3
-1
Vote comment up/down
Bobbob's picture

This was +2 the last time I checked. He must have let you have it with both barrels (meaning accounts).  Keep up the good work! 

+1
-3
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

Here's a lawyer's take on her motion to dsimiss (like him or not):

 

+1
+4
-1
Vote comment up/down
InsertCoin's picture

Interesting to see what the SpikedNation legal experts think of his take.  IMO he's being pretty fair and making solid points, even defending against the misconception that she's going back on everything she said, which she's not; but then explaining how she perfectly contradicts herself lol.  It really is amazing that people think there's still loads of evidence that she just didn't release even though she lost all cases defending a president that outright claims he never loses at anything; cases filed with Republican judges.  

 

Couldn't there be a connection to his many other excuses for his many other losses over his life?  All spun into a narrative of he was either cheated out of something, or the loss was actually a win but no one understands that.  Ironically, this is still a win.  He raised $200 million out of the whole thing and - of course - put in the disclaimers that the defense funds can be used for other things aside from his defense.  Sydney powell did the same thing with DefendTheRepublic and her super PAC.  If you're going to go out, you might as well take as much as you can right?

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
skeptoid's picture

Sidney Powell isn't and never was Trump's lawyer, so your comment doesn't really make any sense. She wasn't acting on his behalf to win or lose anything for him. I've seen folks correct you on this more than once, and yet you keep coming back and making the same badly conflated points. Kind of weird.

+1
-1
-1
Vote comment up/down
Raining Blood's picture

pretty sure powell joined trump's legal team for a hot minute.

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/3D01/production/_115671651_gettyimages-1229757450.jpg

 

anyways. compare this to the many times someone brought up the uptick in votes or any other claim of voter fraud thats been discredited over a dozen times.

+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down