yeah but with the ongoing investigation into georgia's dodgy election last year when thousands of votes went missing, a voting machine flipped every vote, and 1000's of people were prosecuted for successfully voting twice, mixed with this rumour that the DHS had secretely watermarked all ballots and is gathering evidence of fraud via mail-in ballots, it shouldn't end there.
ton of votes appearing suddenly in the middle of the night and all for biden. the counter-claim is that these were early ballots and since biden supported mail-in voting while trump didn't, it makes sense they're mostly for him, but then if that's true why did they only come in suddenly and why only in the middle of the night? if it's possible to count and release that many votes in that time, why does it only happen once?
+1
+2
-1
Vote comment up/down
sal9000 (Long Spike)
so they had year to fix it, but didn't.
saved my comment before the update. i want you to look into what happens when they finish the in person ballot and start counting vote in ballots. the ones that take longer to get a tally. so instead of getting a direct number, you wait a few hours. pretty sure you can find an adjusted graph to take that into account
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sato (Old Spike)
yes you can see where they finished off the last of the in-person votes about an hour before that spike, yet somehow they then managed to count the mail-in votes with unprecedented speed despite having to open them all, verify, and feed them into a machine? it's not plausible. the in-person votes are all verified before the person receives a ballot, the mail-ins should take much longer, but they don't.
+1
+2
-1
Vote comment up/down
Raining Blood (Long Spike)
each vote is verified. if the signature is wonky, they double check it. if they can't they notify the person who voted. it would be nice to think this was a quick as in person voting. now when they count these votes. do you think they just get the number there at and report it or do you think they do groups of 100 and report once there done?
+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
ubershin (Old Spike)
All the damning questions need to be answered to some degree, at least satisfy those who question this type of shit.
Comments
(Old Spike)
yeah but with the ongoing investigation into georgia's dodgy election last year when thousands of votes went missing, a voting machine flipped every vote, and 1000's of people were prosecuted for successfully voting twice, mixed with this rumour that the DHS had secretely watermarked all ballots and is gathering evidence of fraud via mail-in ballots, it shouldn't end there.
https://www.ajc.com/news/state--regional-govt--politics/mystery-missing-votes-deepens-congress-investigates-georgia/x4OTY0ylxfA0Z0Rg6wjkyN/
ton of votes appearing suddenly in the middle of the night and all for biden. the counter-claim is that these were early ballots and since biden supported mail-in voting while trump didn't, it makes sense they're mostly for him, but then if that's true why did they only come in suddenly and why only in the middle of the night? if it's possible to count and release that many votes in that time, why does it only happen once?
(Long Spike)
so they had year to fix it, but didn't.
saved my comment before the update. i want you to look into what happens when they finish the in person ballot and start counting vote in ballots. the ones that take longer to get a tally. so instead of getting a direct number, you wait a few hours. pretty sure you can find an adjusted graph to take that into account
(Old Spike)
yes you can see where they finished off the last of the in-person votes about an hour before that spike, yet somehow they then managed to count the mail-in votes with unprecedented speed despite having to open them all, verify, and feed them into a machine? it's not plausible. the in-person votes are all verified before the person receives a ballot, the mail-ins should take much longer, but they don't.
(Long Spike)
each vote is verified. if the signature is wonky, they double check it. if they can't they notify the person who voted. it would be nice to think this was a quick as in person voting. now when they count these votes. do you think they just get the number there at and report it or do you think they do groups of 100 and report once there done?
(Old Spike)
All the damning questions need to be answered to some degree, at least satisfy those who question this type of shit.