Desperate to bury the Lab Leak Hypothesis

skeptoid's picture

The Media Keeps Trying to "Debunk" Wuhan Lab Theory

Fouci doesn't want to know if gains research blew up in his face. And that's giving him the benefit of doubt.

2.6
Average: 2.6 (5 votes)

Comments

sato's picture

great point about how organisations being dishonest has become acceptable.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
lawngnome's picture

1/5 star votes as usual from the commies

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

This is of course incorrect. There are studies out for peer review in the respective channels on the "lab created virus issue", the one from a german university very much to some german left wing politicians' dismay. And that is all that there is to be reported about atm. Once this has been confirmed or debunked the media can and should report on it.

 

AFAIK The current consent in the scientific community is that there is not enough evidence to support such a claim.

+1
-1
-1
Vote comment up/down
subroutine's picture

nice try with these "science" people... just wait for the explanation of our spiked-danning-kruger-gang

+1
-2
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

Yeah, if the weinstein twat says something it must be true, lol.

+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
skeptoid's picture

There's nothing funnier than seeing someone that you know suffers from Dunning-Kruger refer to those more competent than they are as the danning-kruger gang. If it wasn't for your constant signaling it might be a question but you dispel all doubt. No one is allowed to discuss a hypothesis in the news until a scientist Daft Cunt likes says it's okay? You agree with that, and misspell Dunning-Kruger in the same sentence. Fucking gold man....

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

"No one is allowed to discuss a hypothesis in the news until a scientist Daft Cunt likes says it's okay? "

Sigh, karenoid....

 

I did not really say that. It has been through the news and reputable channels don't enter into that kind of speculation (many have mentioned the studies I referred to and that peer review on this is in progress, thogh).

These people can "discuss" whatever they like, unless they have an experet on their "show" all they do is spew out speculation based on not even a "half knowledge" on the topic. Like beanyhat and crowder like doing so much. And then we end up with the likes of uneducated you spewing out unfounded shit because they like the sound of it and it is matching their bias.

 

Same as on the "widespread voter fraud" topic, yawn.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
skeptoid's picture

No you really did say that. And these two are experts and their positions going all the way back to March 2020 are now mirrored exactly by the so called real scientists and your definition of real experts. The outgoing CDC director was able to give his opinion once he left the CDC - he is an expert. You just don't want to face the fact that you're an idiot and these two were right to say that this hypothesis is valid and should be investigated right from the beginning. It's how you choose to make sense of the world and communicate that outward that makes you such a pathetic example I just don't understand why you engage because it's embarrassing for you. It's a lack of self-awareness or something else that you don't see how embarrassing this is for you.

 

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

I know you like to "have known shit from the start" when you actually didn't. It is being investigated. UP TO NOW no real evidence has been found to support the hypothesis, peer review of at least one real scientific study is currently under way.

 

What else do you want? You can talk about this all you like and throw in more and more rumours, it won't have any impact on the outcome. 

Why can't you just wait patiently like non retarded people do? Ah, yes, the answer is in the question.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down