Youtube's Morality Parables

Comments

RaiThioS's picture
Beta Tester
TheWeirdo's picture
Beta Tester

Me too, lol.

And cooking videos.

+1
+5
-1
Vote comment up/down
bannik's picture

Food and fighting for me... mostly food.... just food

+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
thegent's picture

fair play to this guy..

+1
+2
-1
Vote comment up/down
phanto's picture

I bet if we were run by actually competent people we could turn this around and use it to detect and track pedophiles. But we aren't run by competent people.

+1
+4
-1
Vote comment up/down
robbby1234's picture

"we"?

+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
sato's picture

perhaps, but i can't imagine pedophiles going around being this obvious about it, i'd be shocked if close to 100% of the commenters weren't just stupid kids who think they're funny or nasty adults trying to provoke a reaction from parents (the same ones who make sick fb comments to parents whose kid has died), while any actual pedophiles either watch while staying out of comments to keep themselves anonymous, or are perfectly satisfied with whatever shit they can find in darker areas of the web and thus have no need of youtube.

still think your idea is great though, because at very least the trolls will have to cut it out immediately or risk being actually labelled a pedophile.

+1
-2
-1
Vote comment up/down
phanto's picture

it definitely wouldn't be enough to immediately label someone as a pedophile. But it could easily tell police organization who to start looking at.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sato's picture

yeah but what bothers me with that is that all those police looking into youtube commenters and finding 99% are just lonely trolls then aren't instead spending that time looking into darker places on the internet with seriously sick people and children who really are in danger. we need police looking into the less visible spots, not the disgusting but ultimately harmless frat boys who think they're funny.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
phanto's picture

This only stands true if the majority of those commenters are just trolls. Which I doubt is the case.

+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
bannik's picture

This brings up a bigger question? Why are there so many pedophiles? 

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
thegent's picture

'i can't imagine pedophiles going around being this obvious about it'

i can..if they think theyre getting away with it theyll do it..and they seem to be getting away with it..

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sato's picture

fair point, just because i find it hard to believe doesn't mean it isn't true. and at any rate it would be a start.

+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

1. was expecting something different when he said cum back video.

2. I don't like his oh so involved emotional acting.

3. If it were so easy to spot pedophiles on yt and it is "out in the open" probably authorities are on to them

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
thegent's picture

i dont know man...it seems to be one of those things you have to absolutely be caught in the act to be jailed for...just look up how jimmy saville got away with it for ever..theres a big web of people involved in it apparently across all sections of society and they dont want anyone to get caught in case the whole web collapses as a result..they dont fund the police properly to detect it either..its absolute madness when you look into it..(in the uk im talking about)

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

I understand your point but they catch childpornrings on the dark web, yt should b easier. Also I think they take their time in order to get as many as possible and that they have way better ways of investigating than the twat in the video.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sato's picture

this is what makes me think there are no yt rings, it's just people trying to be edgy. the real pedophiles keep themselves much more hidden.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
thegent's picture

you would want to be some fucked up lad to do that just to be edgy though..i mean why yould you do that? i dont know at all just saying

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
thegent's picture

i honestly hope they do go after them but some of the stories coming out of england from back in the day were astounding.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
Hisoka's picture

CLICKBAIT!

Where the hell is the loli cameltoe I was promised?

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
RaiThioS's picture
Beta Tester

Yes officer, this comment right here.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
sato's picture

this is pretty much what i was talking about in my comment.

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
ninjzz3.0's picture

Why are we blaming YOUTUBE why is it their job to keep your kids safe.. Technology is never going work 100 %  the way you want  here is a idea YouTube is not your babysitter  DONT POST VIDEO OF YOUR KIDS OR LET THEM POST VIDEO AND PEDO WONT SEE THEM..

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
daftcunt's picture

Do you also want to tell girls to go out and not wear short dresses with cleavage in order not to get raped?

+1
-1
-1
Vote comment up/down
hell_viper1's picture
Beta Tester

So I spent 5 minutes thinking about this.

 

1) Use machine learning to detect when children are the main focus of a video (any video) - lets say more than 30%.

 

2) These videos require all comments to be approved by the video poster.

 

3) Flag any accounts that post videos featuring more than 5 differnet children.

 

Perfect? Fuck no.

Better than now? Fuck yes

Easy to implement? Computer vision can do this already

+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
hell_viper1's picture
Beta Tester

LOL. 3 days after I posted this:

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-47408969

 

"YouTube bans comments on all videos of children"

 

... "YouTube told the BBC it would use algorithms to detect which videos contained children"

+1
+1
-1
Vote comment up/down
pimp635's picture
Beta Tester

So fucked up 

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down
bannik's picture

Lol...

+1
0
-1
Vote comment up/down